According to Hayward (2013), Queer Cinema had existed long ago before it was given for an official label until the global traumatizing effect of AIDS in the early 1990s. It was being introduced as a concept during the Toronto Film Festival in 1991. Queer Cinema had been identified with an avant-garde cinema. Its identification has emerged in the mid-1980s through the influence of Queer Theory.
Theory Discussion
Queer Theory is a development of the feminist theory which shares the interest to push further in the non-straight expression of sexuality and gender. As mentioned by Hayward (2013), the Queer theory can be considered as one of the earliest postmodern theories of the early 1990s. It combines a wide range of study which includes all homosexual approaches to the living practices, which includes those within our context and popular culture.
There are four approaches of the Queer theory that had been used to conduct a queer reading of texts. Firstly, queer theory can be seen through popular cultural texts that directly address the homosexual audiences. The filmmakers might overtly include homosexual context, such as homosexual characters in the film to target those non-straight audiences. Besides, we can also see queer theory through works that seem straight or direct to straight audiences, yet these works are also being appreciated by the non-straight audiences. Those contexts that were initially straight would also be viewed as queer. Thirdly, there are several contexts that are made by straight filmmakers, theorist, critics or producers but concerning the non-normative straightness. They would bring up some discussion regarding queer or homosexuality into their film. The last approach would be films and popular cultural context that express the topics beyond the gender binaries and sexuality categories. It can either go beyond the understandings of the normative straightness or the understanding of gay and lesbian.
Synopsis
Megan is a high school student who loves cheerleading and also looks at her fellow cheerleaders. Her lesbian behavior was being suspected by her family and friends, so she was being sent to the reparative therapy camp that “cures” homosexuality, which is called as the True Direction. After Megan realized that she is a homosexual, she started to fall in love with Graham. She was then being dispelled from the camp when she was found to sleep with Graham but Graham is staying till the end of the program and both of them were being separated. During Graham’s graduation, Megan confessed to Graham and both of them stays together.
Analysis
This movie is based on the first approach of the Queer theory mentioned. It is the assessment of popular cultural context that directly addresses the non-straight audiences. This is because it includes a lot of homosexual texts in the content. We can see several representations of queer characters from the film that are queer. For instance, Megan, Graham and those students from the reparative therapy camp are the homosexual characters, which consists of gay, lesbian and bisexual. We can see various representations of homosexual from these characters.
Firstly, Megan is a homosexual who realized her sexuality only after she participates in the reparative therapy as she seemed to be forced to admit her sexuality based on some of her homosexual traits. Before that, she always thought that she is straight despite that she already had a boyfriend. However, she did not realize that she does not really enjoy kissing her boyfriend and unconsciously interested in her fellow cheerleaders. After she realized her “true” sexuality, she slowly falls in love with Graham when time goes on. Therefore, Megan had represented the marginal character who shares the traits of a homosexual without any realization until the society labels her to be one and made her be the real homosexual. Next, we can see Graham as a representation of homosexual who afraid to counter normative sexuality given by the authority. Unlike Megan, Graham is clear that she is homosexual since the beginning. However, when it comes to the authority, it is hard for her to admit this to her parents that she is still a homosexual after several stages of “treatment”. We can also see the representatives of queer who did not want to admit their homosexuality because of the denial of the society. As we know, the society in this film is pretty much anti-homosexualism. Mike, who brought Megan to the camp claimed that he is an ex-homosexual but he seems to have interest on Mary Brown’s son, Rock. Eventually, Rock has also no interest in female as well. People think that both of them are straight as they hide their sexuality from the society.
In the society that I live in, homosexual is still not accepted in general as we have the anti-gay marriage in our country. There are people who are open-minded enough to accept the homosexual but there are still many more who against that and eventually discrimination and stereotype them. Therefore, I think that representations like Megan and Graham are not appropriate to the society. However, representations like Mike and Rock are appropriate as no one in the society knows their true sexuality and might think that they are straight. Hence, they are still acceptable for the society.
Conclusion
Queer theory re-examines the images and subjectivities of sexualities and genders. It encourages equality in the queer readings that should not have any domination but everything should be stand equal. It examines all the queer works regardless it was done by the straight or non-straight individual. The queer theory does not concern with the positive images for queerness but it emphasizes multiplicity. What we can learn from Queer theory is that nothing is objective and everything has more than one way of thinking.
References
Hayward, S. (2013). Cinema Studies The Key Concepts, 4th ed.. USA: Routledge.







